Advances in biotechnology such as the
polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing are making it possible
for scientists and doctors to make huge strides in treating diseases.
However, they have also had an amazing impact on the ability of
the police to both identify criminals – and to prove
that people are innocent of crimes. The first ever murder conviction
which was brought about as a result of DNA evidence also cleared
a man of rape and murder using the same techniques. It is an astonishing
story …
In
1983, fifteen year old Lynda Mann was raped and murdered in Narborough
in Leicestershire. A semen sample was taken from her body, but at
that point scientists could only tell the blood group and certain
enzyme types from the evidence. Three years later another 15 year
old girl, Dawn Ashworth, was also found raped and murdered in the
same area. All the evidence pointed to it being the work of the
same man. The semen samples showed that the blood groups matched.
The police had a suspect – a local man – who
eventually confessed to Dawn’s murder but denied having anything
to do with Lynda’s death. But Chief Constable Michael Hirst
and Chief Superintendent David Baker were convinced that if he had
committed one crime, he had committed both. They contacted Dr Alec
Jeffreys and his team at Leicester University, who had published
work showing how new DNA analysis techniques (what we now call DNA fingerprinting)
could be used to help solve crimes.
When Alec Jeffreys ran a comparison between the semen from both
rapes, and the blood of the suspect, he found that the crimes had
certainly been carried out by the same man – but
it wasn’t the man who had confessed!
David
Baker then decided to set up a mass screening of all the adult males
in the three villages in the area where the girls had lived and
died. 5000 men gave samples, and DNA profiling was carried out on
the 10% of the sample who had the same blood group as the murderer.
The process in those early days was slow and drawn-out, and people
in the Forensic Science Service worked long hours, putting in evenings
and weekends, to deal with all the DNA and track down the killer.
But no match with the DNA from the killer was found – what
else could be done?
Even with the DNA evidence, the killer might have got away with
it and lived to kill another day if it hadn’t been for an
overheard conversation. A local woman heard a colleague boasting
to someone that he had given his DNA sample in a false name –
he had done a mate a favour and claimed to be Colin Pitchfork when
he gave his saliva sample. The woman went to the police, the real
Colin Pitchfork was arrested and DNA samples were taken. Sure enough,
when the results came back, Pitchfork’s DNA profile matched
that of the semen taken from the murdered girls. In 1988 Colin Pitchfork
was jailed for life for taking the lives of the two young girls.
|
Clues – blood,
skin, saliva, semen, faeces – are
left behind at almost every crime scene. Should
there be a national or international DNA database
of everyone's DNA profiles to help police identify
criminals from these clues?
The activity here
will help you to think about the arguments for
and against this idea.
|
|
|
|