Life insurance companies always ask
questions about your family health history before giving you life
insurance. If you have a strong family history of certain diseases
they may set the premiums you have to pay higher than average; the
price you pay for being more likely to die.
But
what if your DNA profile tells a clearer and more detailed story?
That you have inherited genes which means you are very likely to
develop breast cancer in your 20s, or that you are at a much higher
risk than the rest of the population of having a heart attack whilst
relatively young, for example.
There are fears that if insurance companies have access to information
like this, they will refuse to give certain people life insurance.
That in turn would make it very difficult to get a mortgage and
buy a house. So far the insurance industry has not used genetic
testing to weight premiums, and some people think they never will,
because all of us will have something negative lurking in our genes
and yet most people live to a ripe old age. Others think insurance
as we know it will disappear when genetic testing of everyone becomes
routine.
|
- Do you think that genetic
information about individuals should be
made available to insurance companies,
or should they simply be given population
figures to help them plan the risk they
are taking with accuracy?
- Some people think there
should be legislation to prevent insurance
companies from refusing to insure someone
on the basis of their DNA profile. What
are the pros and cons of this idea?
|
|
|
|
|