This topic takes on average 55 minutes to read.
There are a number of interactive features in this resource:
Animations: most of the animations can be expanded to full screen size, ideal for showing on an interactive whiteboard. The animations will play all the way through or can be viewed one section at a time.
This topic has features which you can interactive with, these are usually animations will require you to click to progress to reveal more details.
Not many members of the public are scientists, and so they often don’t have a full understanding of scientific issues. Instead, much of their understanding of subjects such as genetically engineered crops comes from the media. Unfortunately, what you might read in a newspaper isn’t always exactly accurate, either through accident (journalists usually aren’t scientists and might not fully understand what they are writing about) or design (journalists have an opinion and are trying to persuade their readers that it’s the right one).
Now that you know more about genetic engineering, you should be able to analyse a story to see if it is backed up by scientific fact. Chose a story to look at in more detail – either from the links below or by searching for one on the internet – and use what you now know about genetic engineering to decide if each point is fairly made. If you aren’t sure if a point is supported by fact, you should be able to find an authoritative source on the internet to check: the BBC and New Scientist are usually good at accurately reporting science fact; or you could check the website of the Science Media Centre, which provides journalists with scientific information and quotations from science experts.
If you had to re-write your chosen story, would you make any changes?